Step of Proof: not_functionality_wrt_implies 9,38

Inference at * 
Iof proof for Lemma not functionality wrt implies:


  P,Q:. {P  Q {(P (Q)} 
latex

 by ((((((Unfolds ``not guard`` 0) 
CollapseTHEN (GenUnivCD))
CollapseTHENM (HypBackchain)))

CollapseTHEN ((Auto_aux (first_nat 1:n) ((first_nat 1:n),(first_nat 3:n)) (first_tok :t
C) inil_term))) 
latex


C.


Definitionst  T, A, {T}, P  Q, , x:AB(x), P  Q
Lemmasrev implies wf, false wf

origin